So what is a plot?
In its simplest terms it is a plan of action, and where the writer is concerned it is the sequence of events which make up his story.
Here is a sequence of events :-
George woke up that morning.
He showered, shaved and brushed his teeth.
He ate the breakfast his wife had prepared.
He dressed and drove to work.
At his desk he checked his emails.
He processed some orders his company had received.
He ate lunch in the local pub with his friend Bob.
In the afternoon he presented his monthly report to his boss.
He visited the factory and checked output with the foreman.
He drove home and played with his two kids.
He ate dinner with the family.
He watched TV.
He went to bed.
Fascinating? A day in the life of? No, I’d expect you’d say it was boring. Why? Because nothing out of the ordinary happens. There is no plot, or at least none that would interest a reader. So rule number one of creating a plot must be that something happens. Let’s look at that again.
George woke up that morning.
He showered, shaved and brushed his teeth.
He ate the breakfast his wife had prepared.
He dressed and drove to work.
At his desk he checked his emails.
He processed some orders his company had received.
He ate lunch in the local pub with his friend Bob.
Bob told him he loved him.
In the afternoon he presented his monthly report to his boss.
He visited the factory and checked output with the foreman.
He drove home and played with his two kids.
He ate dinner with the family.
He watched TV.
He went to bed.
Well, something certainly happened there. George discovers that his friend Bob is gay and is in love with him.
Does that make this a story?
Not to my mind. What we have is an incident, with no consequent resolution. What are the options?
George is disgusted and breaks off his friendship with Bob.
George admits his own homosexuality and returns Bob’s love.
George tells Bob he knew he was gay but, as a heterosexual, cannot return his love.
This addition of complication starts the process of creating a plot. How much further complication we add is down to the writer. The reader expects a certain level of complexity, but not so much that he loses track of events.
At this point I’d just like to emphasise that physical action is not necessary to create a story. The entire sequence of events could take place inside George’s head. His motivations, desires, fears and thoughts, if portrayed in a logical sequence, would make for a perfectly acceptable tale.
Classical storytelling techniques require a protagonist (the hero) and an antagonist (the villain).
With a three act set-up we create a conflict in the first act. In the second we resolve it, In the third we find that the resolution is not adequate (rising conflict) and further efforts on the part of the hero are required to reach the denouement.
Can good storytelling be reduced to such a simple formula? The answer is yes and no, but in essence it always boils down to these elements.
If you think this is very restrictive look at the variations that can be injected into the above. There can be more than one protagonist (the hero often has a sidekick). The antagonist can also have one or more henchmen. The problem posed which leads to the conflict can be anything from a missing baby’s rattle to the theft of a nuclear weapon. And, within the confines of a story arc that means conflict-effort-resolution we can add as much complication as we can imagine.
Why doesn’t the Bond villain just shoot Bond when he has him prisoner? Because it would make a lousy story. How believable the villain’s motivation is for keeping Bond alive (and thus allowing him to escape) is entirely up to the creative skill of the writer.
There are rules, but they are not hard and fast. They can be played with and modified, but it is essential that you know they exist. Let’s get creative again.
George’s wife, Sally, is driving home from her evening class.
On a lonely country road she is stopped by a terrifying sight, a UFO.
The aliens from the UFO kidnap Sally.
The aliens are a species called the Darg, who are collecting specimens of life from across the galaxy.
So far, so X Files. Where would you go next? Because there still isn’t a story, all we have is a situation. Is this Sally’s story, telling of how she attempts to escape from her abductors? Or is it George’s, as he tries to rescue his wife? Perhaps it is the chief Darg’s story, as he learns to appreciate humanity. The variety is almost endless. Maybe George doesn’t want Sally back, because he’s run off with Bob. Hey, that’s two stories, Bob’s and Sally’s. Wouldn’t that be interesting? It’s called running dual plots and is a common way of fleshing out a story. The denouement of both tales here would probably require Sally’s escape and Bob’s realisation that she is his true love to coincide at the conclusion.
I’m only trying to poke your creativity here, to let you see what possibilities lie in creating characters and running with them. You don’t know where you’re going to end up, or do you?
Here sits a basic problem for new writers, whether to plot in advance or simply to start writing and see where it leads. There are some who will laboriously detail each character and each event before they begin writing. If it works for them, fine, but I find the process boring.
The alternative is to have the kernel of an idea and to start writing immediately while full of fire. The flaw with this system is that you can often end up in blind alleys in your plot and can’t find a way out. Every decision you make as to how your plot develops will have consequences. You can’t have Bob being gay and then running off with Sally without some very sharp explaining that your readers will accept. That’s when unfinished novels get thrown into a drawer.
So, what’s the answer?
For me, it’s this.
I have an idea.
I might take a few swift notes, a rough guide to plot and the main characters.
No more than a page in all.
I begin writing the piece, enjoying the freedom to create.
But I know that danger lies ahead. With every word I write I am locking myself down as to the directions I can take. I also know that the original enthusiasm and inspiration can disappear quite quickly.
So at some point (perhaps 5,000 words) I stop.
Now I do the drudge work. The character sketches, the plot development, the relationship arcs.
How does that work?
If you recall the first lesson on writing non-fiction you’ll know what’s required. A dissection of what you’ve got so far.
Write a synopsis of your idea. It should be no more than 200 words at this stage.
List each character. Give them a brief physical description together with what type of person they are. Cross-reference them, noting their relationship with each other, even if it means saying something like ‘Sally doesn’t know Bob.’
Note the situation your characters are in. Where they live, what they do, how they think.
Return to your synopsis. Is there enough story there to fill your story length (short story/novel). If not, what believable complications can you add to flesh it out? Add this to your synopsis. Does your denouement make sense? All your story and characters arcs must conclude here, so don’t leave any loose ends. Under no circumstances can you write, ‘George awoke and realised it had all been a dream’, unless you have a very valid reason for doing so. That does not include being unable to find your conclusion. Your options are to continue writing till the conclusion presents itself, or to go back in your narrative to the point where you got locked in to the story you eventually wrote, and change it. Characters have a habit of taking on their own life and often the most densely plotted narrative can be thrown off course by a line a character utters or an action he takes. You, as the writer may feel that you are in control, but I have my doubts. When this happens, just keep writing and let the buggers sort it out for themselves.
You’ll find this at times, that it’s not actually you doing the writing, that the characters take over. You don’t need to fight this, it’s a good thing and will lead to some of your best writing. I’ve seen writers return to stuff they wrote years ago and recognise it, but not the fact that they wrote it. This is the subconscious taking over and allowing you to write on autopilot.
Some people call this being taken over by the muse.
Here’s an exercise to help you develop a plot.
Okay, here are a bunch of characters :-
Joe (42) A joiner
Louise (38) Joe’s wife. A hairdresser
Tom (14) Joe and Louise’s son
Martin (24) A professional wrestler
Sandy(19) A female student
Jack (60) A retired dentist
Des (30) A soldier
Mandy (25) A barmaid
Write the synopsis for a plot (500 words) that brings these characters together in one place.
This article is one of a series which, in total, comprise a complete creative writing course. To return to the first lesson, click HERE. To go to the next lesson click HERE.
Written by Gurmeet Mattu
Award winning comedy writer
Technorati Tags: Building, Creative, Learn, Plot, Writing