Need some help with Lacan’s “The Language of the Self,” Ch. II Symbol and Language?
Question by getshorty75: Need some help with Lacan’s “The Language of the Self,” Ch. II Symbol and Language?
I’m researching Lacan for a creative writing project and need some help deciphering his ridculously difficult prose. In Chapter 2 of The Language of Self, he implies that dreams and psychopathology (i.e., symptoms) are analagous to sentences in general and language in particular, right? Lacan suggests that neurotic symptoms manifest from the unconscious via a “sureness of combination[s]” correct? I’m having difficulty understanding, in layman’s terms, how number theory parallels the structure of the unconscious. What does he mean when he writes, “if the numbers resulting from these operations, among all numbers in the actual history of the subject, prove to be symbolizing numbers, it is because they were already latent in the choice from which they began?” Does this mean that the unconscious forms symbolic structures that can’t be “reduced” to original, “pure” components as everything current is colored and shaped by everything preceding them?
Steve, I was inspired by a lecture that joined Lacan, Browning’s “Childe Roland to the Dark Tower Came,” and Christina Rosetti’s “Goblin Market” – language of psychosis and sexual awakening/dysfunction. Lacan is one of the few theorists that joins semantics, psychoanalysis, and art. But you’re right: Lacan is too amused with himself. Jung rocks my world.
Best answer:
Answer by Steve
omg, why are you wasting time on Lacan?
forget about it. The prose is ridiculously difficult because it’s trying to hide the fact that his ideas are not worth all the reading it takes to untangle them.
Jung surpasses any of these guys and will be 10 billion times more inspiring for creative writing.
ps. sorry i didn’t answer your question but Lacan made me sick years ago and i haven’t been back to it since. Jung on the other hand blows my mind every time, well almost , sometimes even he’s full of it, but so’s everyone so you can’t blame him.
Add your own answer in the comments!

